Wheaton Wire

Issue date: 12/5/07 Section: Commentary

Rather than tallying who we believe has done what to whom, the "facts" of which will be biased by those presenting the history, let's focus our efforts at the core of the issue. Perhaps we might begin by examining the cultural and religious values and interests which both sides hold dear and fear losing. Those of you who have studied negotiation may remember the concept of "expanding the pie" from Ury and Fisher's classic, Getting to Yes. Time and energy need not be wasted trying to "prove" a position. Instead, insight and information gained from asking questions and listening deeply can be used to creatively brainstorm alternatives not yet on the table. What else might still be introduced into the equation?

Real diplomacy involves finding "win-win" solutions where everyone is satisfied with the outcome, and getting past the finger-pointing. We don't need to agree about the past, or identify who's "right" and "wrong" to reach a negotiated settlement. We already have an idea of what the "worst alternative to negotiated agreement" is in the Middle East…and it ain't pretty. Let's try another way.

< prev Page 2 of 2

Article Tools